Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Parents, Children, and Staff
by Hanna Greenberg
Permission to freely copy and distribute this document is given, provided that the text is not modified or abridged and this notice is included. For more information about Sudbury Valley School available electronically, check Sudbury Valley School.
Usually I like to focus on the positive aspects of being at Sudbury Valley.
I enjoy thinking about the many facets of life in our little community which
is so rich with wondrous encounters and experiences. Every single student
is like a whole world and in the course of time each one of them shows me
something new that I never knew before. That is what keeps me wanting to
work at SVS all these many years and why it is never boring to be there.
Of course, life is never perfect and neither is Sudbury Valley.
Disagreements and misunderstandings often occur, as they would in any group
of people who share space, time, resources and responsibilities. Students
and staff alike have to learn to live with these problems and overcome the
discomfort or anger that they may feel from time to time. I am no exception
and I admit to having made my share of mistakes by doing or saying things
which were hurtful to others. Sometimes I have been insensitive, neglectful
or forgetful. I have done many things at SVS, and I have been seen by
students at times when I was less than wise or intelligent. Usually they
point out my inadequacies and I can accept their laughter at my expense and
even their anger, because it is clear and above-board. They tell me to my
face what bothers them and give me a chance to explain or apologize. Most
of the time I am astounded by the kindness and tolerance that the students
exhibit and it has taught me to be more understanding of others than I had
been before coming to SVS.
Occasionally, I am angry or hurt by others' mistakes or insensitivities and
then it falls on me to discuss the matter openly with the persons involved
to give them a chance to explain or apologize. By and large people at the
school get along quite well because of this ability to air grievances and
work things through face to face. In cases where communication between
people is impossible they can choose to avoid and ignore each other.
Unfortunately, this mode of interpersonal interactions is thrown out of
balance when it is interfered with by others who are important to the
individuals in the school but who are not a part of the daily life of the
school. What I am going to describe has happened every year since our
inception in 1968, and uncannily is enacted as if according to a script
which is always the same. I would find it bizarre and amusing but for the
pain that it causes to all the participants in this drama, including myself.
This is how it unfolds. Students are led to understand by their parents
directly or by subtle suggestion that it would be good for them to take some
sort of class. The kids agree in principle but can't bring themselves to do
it. What we see is kids who ask for a lesson, and then behave in a manner
which isn't congruent with wanting to take the lesson. Thus they forget
their appointments, or their homework. They may come to the lesson with an
attitude of "tell me what I need to know so I can get this boring stuff
done with as fast as possible and be free to do what I enjoy doing".
Time and again we see bright kids learning very little and hating every
minute of it. They often ask the staff for instruction just before they
leave for the day, or while the staff person is in the middle of another
activity which makes it clear that no lesson can be given. These modes of
behavior are in marked contrast to the way they behave when they want us to
help them do something that they really want to do. Then they hound us with
questions, wait for us to have time to attend to them, retain what we teach
them and avidly do work on their own. They are purposeful and focused and
it is evident in their whole demeanor that nothing will stop them from
pursuing their interest. The contrast with the behavior of the same
students when there is an externally imposed push to take classes is remarkable.
When children are questioned by their parents about classes which they
really are not interested in taking but which they engage in to please their
parents or allay their anxieties, they are in a quandary. How are they to
explain their non-performance? They hem and haw and under enough pressure
they begin to project their own behavior on the staff. They say, almost
with no variation, that Hanna, or Denise, or Danny, or Joan, or Mikel, or
Mimsy, or Carol were too busy to help them, or didn't show up for class, or
were too late to do it, or were uninterested in teaching. Sometimes we are
accused of going shopping instead of attending to the students! At first
when I heard these complaints say about Joan, or Mimsy I thought to myself,
"It's possible that it's true, but it is strange that they are both
attributed the exact same behavior when I know them both to be so different.
Mimsy is so well organized that it is unlikely that she forgot an
appointment, and Joan is usually in the Art room and easy to locate. When
she goes shopping it is for art supplies with a student and all the other
kids in the room know where she went." I wondered: could it be that
the whole staff at SVS talks a good line but refuses to be attentive to the
students needs? Could it be that all of us are identically forgetful,
uninterested in attending to the students needs and dedicated to shopping
during school hours? It didn't make sense.
It was only after numerous repeats of these accusations, leveled at all of
us at one time or another, that the pattern began to show itself clearly.
The formulaic nature of these criticisms belied their truth and revealed
their origins. The students want to do what their parents think is good for
them. However, they find this difficult to do at the school. They are too
busy doing what they think is interesting and important. Only at the
end of the day do they remember what they "ought" to have done.
They need an explanation for their parents and for themselves, which will
not reflect badly on them, and so they attribute their own forgetfulness, or
lack of interest, or preoccupation, to the staff. The trouble is that what
they say doesn't fit the characters of the particular staff involved. It
does, however, fit the stereotypical reaction of kids to parental pressure
to learn things which the parents think are important to learn but which the
students don't.
Neither I nor other staff members hold a grudge against the kids. We know
that both they and their parents are doing what they think is best and that
we have to cope with these complaints as part of our job. But it does upset
me that often the parents involved don't want to hear what we have to say on
the matter. They usually are offended when we imply that the child lied to
them because the child did not want to disappoint his or her parents. They
also often don't agree with us that "suggesting" things to learn
to their children constitutes pressuring their children, and that it is not
in harmony with the school's approach to education.
It looks to me that when things get to this stage the children are better
off in a different kind of school, where there is a curriculum which the
children are obliged to learn and where the teachers coerce them to learn
it. I believe that it would be better for the family, and the children in
particular, not to attend a school where they are daily put into a situation
of conflict between following their own idea of what is important to learn
and listening to their parents' advice. It causes the kids to be depressed,
guilty and anxious and worse, insecure about their future.
Yes, SVS is an all or nothing approach to children. Parents either do or
don't trust their children to acquire the skills needed to survive in
America according to their own judgment. If the latter is the case, it
would be better to transfer the children to one of the many humane and kind
schools available which believe that children need more help and guidance
than we provide at SVS.
|